In 2008, DHS announced regulations that allow for 17-month STEM
OPT and H-1B cap-gap extensions. However,
due to circumstances at the time, DHS failed to give sufficient official notice
of these regulations.
This failure led to a lawsuit, against DHS, by the
Washington Alliance of Technology Workers (WashTech), a union of computer
professionals. The lawsuit challenged the legality of OPT STEM extensions. On
August 12, 2015, the court issued its ruling. The court upheld the validity of these
extensions, but at the same time held that DHS did not follow the correct steps
in implementing the regulations. Ordinarily, the court would have invalidated
the regulations immediately. However, recognizing the significant negative impact
on students and employers, the court gave DHS until February 12, 2016 to
announce and implement properly new regulations. That is, the court delayed, by
six months, the effect of its order to invalidate the regulations. The court
said that should DHS properly implement new regulations in time, those new
regulations would continue. Here is the court’s decision, referencing the
February 12 date: https://ecf.dcd.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/show_public_doc?2014cv0529-43
On October 19, 2015, DHS did announce new OPT STEM
regulations. The most significant change was the increase of STEM extensions to
24 months rather than 17 months. As required by law, DHS gave official notice
and specified a time for interested parties to offer comments. Here is a link
to the proposed regulation: https://www.federalregister.gov/articles/2015/10/19/2015-26395/improving-and-expanding-training-opportunities-for-f-1-nonimmigrant-students-with-stem-degrees-and
In January 2016, DHS asked the court to extend the original
February 12 deadline. Its reason for doing so was the large number of comments
it received. DHS argued that the number of comments meant that DHS needed more
time to consult with interested parties, such as employers and universities,
about the new regulations.
On January 23, 2016, the court agreed, giving DHS until May
10, 2016, to implement the new regulations properly. Here is the court’s
memorandum opinion: https://ecf.dcd.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/show_public_doc?2014cv0529-51
Therefore, if you currently are working under a STEM
extension that ends after February 12, 2016, that work authorization will continue even past this original deadline. Furthermore, if your original STEM authorization
extends past the second deadline of May 10, 2016, then your ability to continue
working will depend on whether or not DHS implements its new regulations
properly by that time, and for the regulations to survive any legal challenges. If so, you would not only be able to continue
working, but also possibly could extend your authorization for the additional time
provided by those new regulations.
Please keep in mind that the regulations in dispute involve
more than just OPT STEM extensions. They also involve the ability of certain
H-1B beneficiaries to get an OPT cap-gap extension. Therefore, such persons
also should be interested in seeing that DHS implements these new regulations properly
and on time.
The above information
does not constitute legal advice and does not form an attorney-client
relationship. Unless otherwise stated, this information assumes a person is maintaining the conditions of his or her status.
Calvin Sun, Attorney at Law
215-983-3723
csun@calvinsun.com
We Chat: calvin_t_sun
www.avvo.com/attorneys/19301-pa-calvin-sun-1935383.html
215-983-3723
csun@calvinsun.com
We Chat: calvin_t_sun
www.avvo.com/attorneys/19301-pa-calvin-sun-1935383.html
Wonderful article, thanks for putting this together! This is obviously one Great post. Thanks for the valuable information and insights you have so provided here.Singapore Study Visa Consultants
ReplyDeleteSingapore Study Visa Consultants India